Category Archives: Life

Facing Down A Writer’s Dilemma

©2016 by Raymond Alexander Kukkee

[caption id="attachment_3714" align="aligncenter" width="640"] Part of a little village...Morgidoo's Christmas Carol
'The tiny church on Blister Street'[/caption]    

A Writer's Dilemma

 

Well, how about that cool winter holiday,  people?

  It was a long, yes, but somehow, it seemed  a whole lot longer. I  have been mulling over  a writer's dilemma...which, sooner or later, like everything important,  must be faced down. Surprisingly difficult  decisions must be made in the writing life. Have you made any lately?

Publishing decisions, that is ... Simple?  No.   A writer's dilemma ,  two less-than-perfect choices, each with its own benefits and drawbacks.  Tough choices.

We have  been totally distracted here at Incoming Bytes.

Distractions put off decisions, but I tend to digress to allow time to think.  Does that happen to you?

  Even for the most savvy of writers hard decisions must eventually be made.  Get to it, a path must be chosen.   We're getting closer.

Let's procrastinate.   Coffee anyone?   See what happens?   Writing is  more than coffee, staring at that damned  cursor, having discussions with the muse,  and petting the pups. Decisions like going independent or renewing existing publishing contracts come up and must be made. To renew or not? To remain with a publisher or not?  Drop anchor, or set sail off into a stiff breeze?  There 'ya go. Decide already. Facing down a writer's dilemma... is much easier said than done.

Here's the thing;  as writers, we collectively desire success; we want  someone, anyone-- to actually buy and read our  novels, whatever we're scribbling.  Being 'out there' pretty as you please on a publisher's website  isn't enough. Reality sucks big time; in the starving writer's attic, dollars pay for bread.

We all dream that readers will  be interested enough to  bust the bank and buy  a real book, —a novel, preferably one  of our own.  Facing reality and the increasing cost of living, writers   dream not only of writing a winner, but of actually being paid, too —a lot more than the unrealistic  pittance called royalties now offered by publishers.  It's a tough game.

In theory the whole process is simple enough; write a great book,   find a great publisher, an insanely insatiable, interested community of readers, and sell, sell sell  to the right demographics, etc. etc...   The book simply has to fill a need and a niche.  It seems simple enough, but is not. 

Your book  must also fulfill  expectations.  Interpretation of your vision, book classification,  publicity, marketing, a timely launch.  All of the above. Your book must  be unique, well-written, formatted, edited, loved and mollycoddled by your publisher...and then sold all the way to the million copy best-sellers list...  Okay.  That's quite a lot to ask.

As an author,  success and financial returns are only one consideration. Future sales potential, future books,  perception of important  friendships, the supportive author community   —and so many other aspects also occur in an author/publisher business relationship. Simple enough?

What is not simple however, is how, or why, publishers make those all-important and critical production decisions made for your book.  Covers, formats,  fonts,  printing, marketing ploys,  write-ups, and ultimately promotions, discount sales, giveaways,  whatever.  Interpretations and decisions out of your control.  Everything a publisher does affects your book;  all of these 'production decisions'  are critical to success. Do some go astray?  We hope not, but, indeed, some inevitably must.

Keep in mind decisions made by  publishers are never   'wrong' from the publisher's point of view or master plan at the time... Good publishers have a vision they would like to see fulfilled— they, too, want success for their authors.  Does that success always happen? No.  Do publishers always make the correct written-in-stone decisions for every author, every book?  As the author, guess what? Only you can decide. In addition,  some decisions don't seem to work—for whatever the reason.

Let's talk about a specific book.  It is a good example.   The publishing contract  simply expired for my Christmas classic "Morgidoo's Christmas Carol, " so all stops are pulled;  it is now  top priority even though Christmas is still 10 months away.    Am I looking closely at all of the options available?  You bet. Including going Indie.

Morgidoo going Indie Well? Why not? I  published the 1st. edition back in 2011 as an eBook. MCC was subsequently picked up by Rocking Horse Publishing for the 2nd Edition (2013). 

Why change now? Two Years later...Sales have not been great.  Why?  For a much-loved Christmas classic written for all ages,  a unique story,  poor sales were certainly not expected, and realistically, the status quo is not going to cut it.    Not enough promotion? Who knows.  There can never be enough promotion for any book by author or publisher.

 

A  'Look at The Book'  View

 Let's get to it. Out in the market, the contentious square format apparently  labeled this Christmas classic  as  only a child's book —another writer's dilemma —and in fact resulted in negative feedback  to this author.

"Great cover, great story, but..." comes to mind.  Why?  Adults immediately perceive the square format to be a 'kiddie book" product. Subconsciously or not.   The surprising fact is,  adults apparently do not like  square, flimsy, skinny formats which demand table space instead of standing vertically on shelves  'like real books do'  as someone suggested, tongue in cheek.  Miffed upon hearing that possibility,  I did an unofficial experiment.

One of my favourite hobbies is observing people, so during the recent Christmas season, I  stood about and, interestingly, observed that shoppers tend to studiously ignore tables loaded with a great variety of  "square format" books.  "Those are  kid's books", some commented. "They're not real books, and are really overpriced for what you get".   "I don't buy them for my kids. "I don't bother with them." "I don't have kids."  That last comment was reasonable, but the comment  "I hate skinny, square books..." was an eye-opening response received from one shopper.  Verbatim. "...they're awkward to read, and you have to pile them up somewhere."

That said it all.  Fair enough. The square format could potentially be detrimental to the sales of books mature readers might otherwise consider.  In marketing, not a happy thought.

  I thought about that conundrum for quite a while.  Reality is an incredibly steep learning curve.  Learn by making mistakes, and don't get paid for it.

Bottom line,  I was forced to conclude:   "Politically-correct or not, publisher decision or not the square format was likely a bad choice;  perception is everything,  the book-buyer makes the ultimate decision, the customer is always right, yada-yada. Time for reality.

 

Decision Time. 

As a result, the 3rd Edition  of  Morgidoo's Christmas Carol  will  now  be re-edited, re-formatted to it's original  vertical format, and coincidentally,  will be launched under my own publishing label,  (Whitewood Forge Publishing.)  New cover, new format,  true to the original edition, even subtitled "The Bells of Blister" which was the original file subtitle. But still  new.

You got it. New. Reshaped.  More consumer-friendly.  Will these marketing choices work?  Only time will tell.

Morgidoo's Christmas Carol (The Bells of Blister) will be issued both in print and as a Kindle eBook. Be advised the 3rd. edition will look VERY, very  different.  It will look like the timeless classic it IS...suitable for readers of all ages.

Watch for it...........  Coming soon.

How about that. Another writer's dilemma faced down.

Is that Incoming I hear?

  Photo credit: © 2016 'The tiny church on Blister Street'
Posted in Books, Business, Life, Publishing, Reflections, Uncategorized, Writing Life | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Epic Failure Cut Canada in Half

©2016 by Raymond Alexander Kukkee [caption id="attachment_3684" align="alignnone" width="1024"]The Nipigon River Bridge The Nipigon River Bridge (rendering Credit MTO/MRC)[/caption]      

 "Why is there only one Trans-Canada route?"

An Epic Failure Cut Canada in half?  Too Easy!

 

Unbelievable! No, this is not fiction.  An epic failure cut Canada in half. For a short time, the failure of the brand new, Nipigon River Bridge  cut Canada in half. Unbelievably, this bridge is the ONLY link between eastern and western Canada.  The bridge transfers $100M in goods across the Nipigon River every day of the year, hauled by thousands of transport trucks and other vehicles in both directions.  In addition, Canadians cross this bridge daily, emergency vehicles, tourists, every bit of traffic across Canada MUST use this bridge, so how could a project, critical infrastructure,  so incredibly important to a nation —be allowed to fail?

Do politicians recognize how vulnerable this leaves Canada and Canadians?  Does the increasingly-demonstrated-incompetent Wynne government even realize the implications of  what has occurred?

Why is there only one Trans-Canada route? Let us ask that question again!

Why is there only one Trans-Canada route?

Bridge Design by Ego instead of Logic?

The  EPIC failure of the new,  ego-generated,  'state of the art'  cable stay (suspension-type) bridge on the TransCanada Highway (Highway 17)  just east of Nipigon, Ontario,  cut Canada in half instantly  on January 10th, 2016  without any prior noticeGet that?

People were stranded on both sides in sub-zero winter conditions.  Emergencies were declared. Local c0mmunities responded by taking in travelers.   Worth repeating, Highway 17, the TransCanada highway, is the ONLY highway link between east and west.  It must be asked again, and again, if necessary,  "Why is there only one Trans-Canada route?"

Was this bridge considered suitable for Canada's extreme climate? Wind?  Was the bridge designed by ego and hot air instead of logic? The Nipigon suspension bridge is the only one of its design in Ontario.   "It will be a major tourist attraction, blah, blah, blah, "  is heard from politicians constantly.

How important. Political egos, apparently, are more important than safety, reliability and the transport of essential goods and services...

The Epic Failure: by bad design and Inept Engineering, or Failed, CHEAP IMPORTED materials?

The first half  (with only two of the planned three pylons and one deck, presently consisting of two lanes,  the future westbound lanes) of the bridge was in use. The  bridge had only been opened to traffic (used temporarily for both directions)  in November, 2015.  

The disastrous, epic failure resulted in one end of the bridge being heaved up about 2 feet (60cm) unevenly above the roadway, leaving the bridge inaccessible and temporarily unstable.   Huge structural bolts snapped.  

The bridge deck reportedly raised  about a half meter and settled back down, —but not back into place, leaving the bridge deck about 2' above the abutment ends and the highway grade. 

So —questions MUST be asked:

  • was this disastrous failure a result of bad design and inept engineers unfamiliar with the extreme weather in Northwestern Ontario
  • was wind a factor?
  • were improperly-tested, cheap imported materials from China used?
  •   Did the steel cables shorten in the extreme cold unevenly, putting undue pressure on the abutments, creating an upward slingshot effect when the bolts snapped? 
  • Why are the cable spans uneven (different lengths, on east and west?)
  • Were the cable webs tensioned improperly or unevenly? Is the design unbalanced?
  • Was it an on-site construction or engineering error?  
  • Even if the bridge is repaired, will the same thing occur with the substantially colder and more severe winter conditions of Northwestern Ontario? 
  • Why was the bridge designed with three pylons—to ultimately carry  traffic both eastbound and westbound on the same vulnerable structure,  —at the same vulnerable location —when completed?   To save cost?
  • Is the bridge even safe to use?
  • Is public safety now to be a major, long-term issue with this construction at this essential river-crossing?
  • Who will be held responsible for this epic failure? The Wynne government, which approved this project?
  • Why is a complete twinning of the Trans-Canada highway NOT a major infrastructure project of the Federal government?
 

The severing of the Trans-Canada highway, the ONLY link across Canada  is unacceptable by any stretch of the imagination.  Action is required.

Here at IncomingBytes we suggest that the FEDERAL government must, of necessity, become involved in the construction of an all-weather, fully-accessible alternative bridge link across this POTENTIALLY-DISASTROUS  choke point in Canada —and investigate the handling of the whole project.

#

 

*update:  Single-lane traffic is now crossing the bridge slowly,  alternating directions in turn, being led by a "pilot vehicle".   Perfect. Traffic is delayed BOTH ways for an undetermined period of time while engineers and politicians alike scratch their heads to determine 'what went wrong' with this fancy piece of under-engineered  ego...... and how to REPAIR the famous, failed  bridge which cut Canada in half, —at a cost of $106 million dollars.  Yes, $106M of taxpayer loot.  Your loot.

How typical. 

##

Is that Incoming I hear?

Posted in Business, Civilization, Economic issues, Life, Major Issues, Politics, Uncategorized | 4 Comments