Category Archives: Politics

Trudeau’s Epic Failures Continue…Justin must Go

  ©2017 by Raymond Alexander Kukkee       [caption id="attachment_3981" align="alignnone" width="300"]The inverted Maple Leaf flag of Canada --a symbol of distress Canada in Distress[/caption]    

Trudeau's Epic Failures:  What Next?

 

For the record, Canadians  don't generally care to criticize.   We're Canadian, get that? It's a given. Canadians  really don't want to criticize; it is not in our nature. Perhaps we are too isolated. Making a living. Trying to keep warm.  Preoccupied with interesting projects.  Obsessed with   hockey. Too Canadian. Or maybe it is that we are  just too polite.  With that given, are we forever to remain silent?   Trudeau's epic failures keep piling up, one after the other.  Unacceptable by any standard of 'governance.' What's next?

How many more aberrations and cute, dramatic  tricks are Canadians ready to tolerate in this already-proven disastrous experiment with immature, inexperienced politicians? Chosen by gender. Chosen by an immature, unpredictable  teacher of drama to enable his own agenda.   Not promising.

   

How about Justin Trudeau himself?

  Has "choosing a politician  because his daddy was famous,"  —a prime minister once, —or even twice ever been  a stellar  idea?   It's been a while, but you do know  to whom we refer, do you not?  The infamous Pierre Elliot Trudeau  himself, 'Justin's Daddy'  of all people.  Mr. Fuddle-duddle.  Mr. "Just Watch Me".  Mr. Arrogance himself. Do you remember that ?

Well, guess what. The epic foolishness of Trudeau the Elder as Prime Minister of Canada not once, but twice —still rankles,  and the legacy of problems he willfully created in Canada may never be resolved. The bitter Meech Lake Accord and the failure to bring Quebec into the Constitution. The badly flawed Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that included a 'notwithstanding' clause by which any and all rulings for compliance  can be bypassed and suspended at any time. The dictator's back door.  He used The War Measures Act on the citizens of Canada.

Now, to 2015. The dismay of millions of Canadians duped by  charm, hormones and 'nice hair',   tactical lies and political bribery, the comedic, lewd, inept and incompetent Trudeau   "legacy of diddling and social manipulation"  carries on.   Justin Trudeau (the boy) —who has insisted upon proving himself to be a loose cannon with an insatiable, dangerous ego and arrogance of the elite. And an obsession with  turning Canada into the world's first Islamic post-nation state.  Without borders. Without any respect for Indigenous peoples, or for 150 years of Canada-building by Euro-Canadians.

 

Trudeau's Epic Failures

"Justin and friends" are fully intending  to repatriate ISIS fighters to Canada. Allow enemies of Canada to move back home. They will  pretend they are model Canadians now, and be warm and fuzzy model citizens.  After all, in Trudeau's book, "a Canadian is a Canadian is a Canadian"....right.  Unless they are hardened ISIS fighters, murderers and terrorists.

But in Trudeau logic, in that insane,  limp, inane and dramatic  mind, they will be just ....fine, because they'll be 'watched'  and repatriated and reintegrated and de-radicalized by ...whom?   Justin himself.  Will he pay each of them $10.5M to 'be good boys now'  --until he calls upon them to further his own Islamic agenda?

If the invitation of murderous, traitor ISIS fighters back into Canada  is not one of Trudeau's epic failures, what is?  Gambling with innocent Canadian lives is not  'governance' —it is  dereliction of duty by this Prime Minister and his 'gender-selected' incompetent government charged with the security of this nation.

At this date, as many as 60 or more—an unknown number of 'fine' ISIS fighters, hardened killers,  prepared to kill at any time  —have already been allowed to return to Canada.   For "re-integration" and "de-radicalization" at the expense of  the people of Canada, whose very lives have been placed at risk.

   

International Fizzle and Insults

Let's move on the Asian tour and the Philippines, where Trudeau's childish, idealist diplomacy  rankled world leaders. He didn't bother to show up as scheduled for a scheduled meeting of global leaders, who rightfully expected to be treated with dignity.   Instead, with the Trans-Pacific Partnership hanging in the balance, busy, dignified world leaders  collectively yawning, waited endlessly for Justin.  A gigantic, if imperfect trade deal in the making. Picture that. Waiting for Justin and his social manipulation,  personal drama, a personal agenda, and personal, childish arrogance.

How about that?  Worse yet, he went on to anger  Philippines Pres. Duterte by naively criticizing Duterte and his  admittedly questionable record of human rights when dealing harshly  with drug squads and terrorists of the Islamic variety —who recently murdered two Canadians,  rewarding Canada and  Trudeau's inaction with execution of the two captives by decapitation.  Really. (We must wonder if Justin intends to advise Pres. Duterte how to 'de-radicalize' those murderers also.)

Is Justin's Canadian 'record of human rights'  perfect?  No. More like the perpetuation of brutal colonialism out of control. Ask the Indigenous First Nations peoples about residential schools, destruction of their culture, being forced off of their territories  onto inadequate, embarrassing reserves, and water unfit for any use lasting 20 years.  Ask about their poverty.  Ask the Inuit who lived and thrived upon their lands for centuries,  about 'relocations'.  Ask them, too, about  poverty,  and lack of respect and willful destruction of their culture. More  epic failures of diplomacy, failed governance, and little but lip service  for human rights.

   

And then Came  Myanmar

Well... Justin also decided he could arrogantly lecture Aung San Suu Kyi,  the gracious (some 70 y.o.)  leader of Myanmar (now an honourary citizen of Canada ) for the perceived 'ethnic cleansing' of Rohingya Muslims.

The on-going social difficulty in Myanmar resulted in a large exodus of women and children to the border of Bangladesh, where the  'refugees'  are living in tents, 'survivors' of  expulsion from their homes,  the burning of villages and mayhem, rape and murder which was reportedly  conducted with vengeance by strong-armed, nasty Buddhists.

 

Investigation...of Tents?

All was subsequently investigated and  reported by Trudeau's Canadian  envoy,  the one and only tiny Bob Rae (ex NDP,  now Liberal).  Bob dutifully traveled to Myanmar, looked at the mud and water, sheds, shacks,  and most notably, met with a group of women in tents.  Not men. Collecting harrowing stories...but we must ask, did Bob Rae get it right?   Where were the men?  Out invading the west as usual? Let us pause and hypothesize for a moment.  Women in tents,  who reportedly  took flight in  terror  may not willingly admit there is any another plausible scenario.  Perhaps under threat,  they  do not care to comprehend  or admit— that Islamic extremists, long a festering, troublesome  sore in Myanmar,  also have guns and torches, regularly cause mayhem,  —and in the pursuit of Islamic expansionism of today are known to happily decapitate, brutalize, rape, ship off  or sacrifice both women and children, their 'property'  in any attempt to induce fear and spread the dark shadow of Islam.

Is  this human tragedy simply more tactical deceit practiced by Muslims to gain sympathy and  'victim-hood' to once again, dupe the West into responding, allowing and foolishly enabling more migration, another invasion of the west?  Worth noting,  rich Arab countries have yet to take one Muslim refugee from Syria, Somalia or other Muslim countries. Why would that be?  Isn't that a red flag? Bottom line, we must be curious, but certainly  don't pretend to know. Bob Rae doesn't know. Canadians don't know. Perhaps we don't want to know.  Are Canadians responsible for the actions of other countries, other cultures or cults, however brutal,  incompatible and disliked?   Whoa, let's not get too dramatic or distracted by actually thinking.

But have no fear,  Justin Trudeau  is just childish and arrogant enough to think that as a drama teacher and ski-boarder,  he is self-qualified to teach world leaders how to operate their nations to his specifications and believe ladies in tents.   The information coming from ladies in tents is dramatic and appeals to his feminist bent, and suits his agenda, so it must be the truth.   That entitles him to lecture away.    Go figure. 

   

...and ...Mexico...

More of Trudeau's epic failures crop up at every turn.   Especially when Mexico, one of our NAFTA trading partners, (for 20 years)  cursed Trudeau  in genuine CTV-bleeping  language —(He said it  like 'talk ( but spelled with an extra-big "F" up front,  ie, that Falking traitor Trudeau,  and we're not going to pay for that Falking  wall either ) bleeeeeep..bleeeep.. as he  accuses Trudeau of treachery and  sacrificing Mexico in a shoddy attempt to enable a new NAFTA deal with the US.

*Psst...Justin,  the old Mexican President doesn't like you at all. Not one bit. Neither do millions of Canadians.

 

 In Fact...

In fact, just ask any real Canadian about Justin.   Feminist fluff, whitewash, drama,  dishonesty,  and blatant hypocrisy.  Perhaps even corruption, as he tries to keep a sinking Minister of Finance afloat with his 'faith in xxx' speeches.   Let us not become too disturbed by  nonsensical blather, immaturity, lack of protocol,  sock fetishes,  ga-ga selfies,  compulsion to lead lewd parades, and  obsession with gender confusion.

Let us, instead, be concerned with Trudeau's epic failures --and his  betrayal of Canada.

 

#

 

Is that Incoming I hear?

 
Posted in Civilization, Major Issues, Politics, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Identification of Canadians and the Quebec Ban

©2017 by Raymond Alexander Kukkee   [caption id="attachment_555" align="alignnone" width="406"]Full-face coverings including the burqua Women wearing Burkas  -Who ARE You?[/caption]      

Identification of Canadians and Quebec's  Bill 62:  Who Are You?

The Province of Quebec recently passed Bill 62, the ban of full-face covering —for anyone giving or receiving public services.  The controversial ban is criticized  by the 'politically-correct'  as being specifically aimed at Muslim women.  Wrong.   It is not. It is aimed  inclusively  at  all persons in Quebec,  any and all individuals, any citizen, foreign, immigrant, visitor, asylum seeker, fake refugee  or otherwise—any 'person'  receiving or giving services  who  arrogantly insists upon hiding  (his/her/its/gender-neutral, modified, transformed, whatever, your choice) their natural face.  You got it, anyone in Quebec who hides  their faces and identity from other Canadians is now required to conform to a common-sense law.

   

Who ARE You?  Identification of Canadians... a valid Question of Security

 

"Who are you?" remains a valid question of security for people world-wide. Around the globe.  Identification of  Quebeckers, in fact any and all Canadians or others  with covered faces in public places  —is a security issue.

Don't like it?  Get used to it.  Join the modern world.  France and other countries including Belgium, Austria, the Netherlands have done the same.   Worth noting, some Muslim countries also recognize that security is paramount and must come firstChad, and even Egypt are doing the same. With good reason.  Terrorists use deception and hide their faces, gender, and intent. Full-face coverings are NOT  an "Islamic" religious requirement contrary to the loudly-expressed opinions of perhaps well-intentioned—but   ill-informed protesters.

   

Identification of Canadians and the Stigma of Hidden Faces

Here in Canada we are an 'open-faced society' and always have been. Hidden faces have traditionally and correctly borne  the stigma of suspicion and evil. The indeterminate stranger approaches presenting unknown and  potential danger.   Lack of trust is invariably created, regardless of what  lurks behind masks and other forms of face coverings.

   

Hidden faces have been and will continue to be  associated with persons having something to hide,   criminality,  untrustworthy, evil  intent. Shady individuals, attackers, break and enter artists and car thieves alike do not want their faces revealed before or after being caught.  Terrorists with murder on their minds do not wish to be identified. ISIS 'fighters' and extremists of every kind practice secrecy of  the worst kind.  Hidden intent.  Terrorism.  The past 20 years has demonstrated an automatic correlation between hidden faces and masks, including  "burquas and hijabs".  We cannot help that.  How unfortunate.  But to deny the association between 'hidden faces' of any type and human lack of trust  is to be naive,  uninformed, and foolish.

   

Benefits of Open Faces and Identification of Canadians

Yes. Benefits. Open faces offer more than simple  visual confirmation of  identification.  Uncovered faces  increase trust between people in daily contact, on passing,  standing  face-to-face, silently, speaking directly to one another or not.  Open faces improve communication via  the inherent  understanding of  natural and unmistakable  language of facial expression.    Faces signal intent, friendship, status, happiness, sadness,  good or evil  —although such an interchange may be subtle, missed entirely,  understood or not.

     

Why are there Objections to Reasonable and logical Identification of Canadians? Why is this even an issue?

Open, honest and uncovered faces improve tolerance, inclusion, and acceptance above all.   Worth repeating, uncovered faces  offer inclusion, acceptance, and even potential friendship to strangers. Open faces reduce concerns for personal  safety— by honestly addressing, reducing or completely eliminating  suspicion. 

Canadians naturally object to covered faces for all of the above reasons. Canadians are, by our very identity, history  and  nature, friendly, open-faced, inclusive and tolerant of those who dress 'strangely' and those who may be  'different'. We want to know who specifically stands before us for any purpose.

   

On the Other Hand...

Want to be looked upon with suspicion by all? Try it. Cover your face fully. Hide your face from any and all observers and passers-by. Lurk in public places,  courts of law, lineups at bus stops, at the mall, in lineups at the show, ceremonies,  events, schools,  the supermarket,  the welfare office, or your neighbourhood community center. Try entering an airport wearing a balaclava—and see what happens.  Expect to be confronted and identified.

While you're at it, protest  Canadian social life, Canadian traditions,  and whine loudly.  Scream racism!    Hide your face so nobody can determine who you are, what you are  protesting and  whining loudly for, or screaming dissent.

How about let's sneak about like it's Hallowe'en. Close enough.  Pretend you're practicing  "it's a woman's choice' ,  imagine you are a different gender and supporting "women's issues."  Pretend that you're a 'feminist',  as certain out-of-touch,  ill-informed, confused and incompetent politicians posing as 'leaders'  seem to be prone to encourage. Does a  full-face covering make your voiced opinion any braver, any  more valid?  No.  In fact, the opposite;  the hidden face  demonstrates cowardice.

One may use the excuse  that a burqua, Lone Ranger mask,  niquab, rubber Grinch-face,  wooden voodoo mask, head-scarf,  extreme-weather face-cover-hoodie, ski-mask, hollowed-out pumpkin-head, rubber duck costume,  toque,  or northern balaclava — is somehow  justified by  a "religious requirement" and a 'religion'.   It is not. They are not. None of the above face coverings qualify for exemption or eliminate, dismiss, or trump the logical and reasonable quest for security for ALL Canadians. 

Walk into a bank or jewelry store or bank—or  any other civilized workplace with a full-face covering  and try withdrawing money or inciting a  nasty public demonstration— and discover why full face covering are a bad idea.  

This is Canada. It is time for politicians of all stripes to remind themselves why the essential   tradition of  open-faced  identification of Canadians IS the essence of Canada.  

#

     

Is that Incoming I hear?

Posted in Civilization, Commentary, Ethics, Humanity, Life, Major Issues, Politics, The Human Mind, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment